Survé plans to list a new media group, Sagarmatha Technologies, which mainly belongs to his family trust.
According to Anton Alberts, an MP of the Freedom Front Plus, the tiny Afrikaner opposition party in the South African parliament, the GEPF is already implicated in Iqbal’s Survés finances.
“Through the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) that manages the pension fund, the GEPF already holds a 25% share in Independent Media,” Alberts said in a statement. “According to media reports in Business Day, Independent Media finds itself in a financial crisis and it is hoped that selling Sagarmatha Technologies shares after the company is listed on the JSE on Friday, will save Independent Media. It seems as if the plan is to incorporate Independent Media into Sagarmatha Technologies so that the newly-listed company can fund the sinking company.”
Independent Media is one of the mainstream media companies controlling The Star and Cape Argus newspapers, as well as the Independent Online (IOL) website. It regularly publishes anti-white tirades by black columnists as well as anti-Afrikaner propaganda by “Janet Smith” who purports to be a British journalist.
Advocate Alberts is of the opinion that “there is a problem with the listing of Sagarmatha Technologies because, according to reports, the company is technically insolvent and first needs to find private funding before it will be able to comply with the Financial Markets Act. The company must prove that it is capitalised with at least R500 million (about $40 million) and chances are that the PIC was once again approached to invest in yet another Iqbal Survé venture.”
For this reason, the FF Plus yesterday addressed a letter to Mr Deon Botha, the head of corporate affairs at the PIC, asking whether the PIC will indeed buy the said shares. As yet, no response has been received.
“If the PIC is indeed planning on buying Sagarmatha Technologies shares, the FF Plus will advise the GEPF pensioners to immediately obtain an interdict against the transaction,” said Alberts.
The FF Plus MP also gave other examples of how public servants’ pension money was had been misused for suspicious transactions over the last few years. The fund, with assets of R1,87 trillion, is the biggest investor in the country’s economy, which makes it an attractive target for exploitation.
Such examples of financial abuse are:
- February 2018: The PIC lends R5 billion to Eskom in the form of bridging finance.
- March 2018: The Reserve Bank places VBS Mutual Bank under curatorship. The PIC holds approximately a 30% share in VBS. It is also widely known that VBS gave former President Jacob Zuma a loan of R8 million to cover his Nkandla debt. The FF Plus is of the opinion that the PIC’s acquiring of shares in VBS was not purely motivated by business considerations.
- The PIC had an enormous investment in Steinhoff and in December last year, the misgiving that the GEPF could suffer a loss of up to R12 billion with this investment was voiced.
- In 2015, the PIC saved Lonmin from ruin by acquiring a further 25% of the platinum producer, on top of its existing shares, through the struggling platinum producer’s rights issue. The investment amount was R1,9 billion. What is important to note, however, is that this was after Lonmin’s share price decreased with 80% in the previous year – from R35 to a mere R3. In terms of market value, it decreased from R29 billion to R3,5 billion in a single year, so this was no more than a blatant bailout.
- In 2014, there were reports that the PIC invested nearly R3 billion in an oil company, Camac Energy, which was basically bankrupt. According to the reports, Mr Kase Lawal, an American of Nigerian descent and acquaintance of former President Jacob Zuma, was head of the company. There were no further reports and it is not clear whether the company still exists.
- In 2016, there was great dissatisfaction when an economic development plan for Tshwane/Pretoria, with money coming from the PIC, was adopted and it was announced that “only black people” would benefit from it.
In the light of the many examples of poor investment decisions prompted by political intervention, Alberts stated that “it is clear that many of the PIC’s transaction was not driven by healthy business considerations”.