Why is America taking BLACK refugees from South Africa but NOT Whites?

In ONE MONTH ALONE, October 2014, USA took in 322 black refugee asylum seekers FROM SOUTH AFRICA, which is supposed to be deemed a safe country.

White asylum seekers from South Africa who try to claim are told that South Africa is a safe country and therefore they cannot claim asylum, yet blacks are accepted without question. Furthermore the ANC regime aggressively intervenes in all white asylum applications WORLDWIDE. Making the notion of asylum and the United Nations a mockery…

Why this racist discrimination?

White asylum seekers from South Africa are already fleeing from discrimination where there are over a hundred laws preventing whites from access to jobs, schools, Universities, welfare, etc. etc.

There is also the on-going disproportionate murder rate of whites and specifically white farmers.

Statistically 54 per 100,000 blacks are killed, yet 139 per 100,000 white farmers! Making it almost 3 times more likely. Being a white farmer in South Africa is the most dangerous occupation IN THE WORLD by mortality rate. YET ASYLUM IS NOT ALLOWED?

But liberal America loves to put a gloss on their moral high ground and pat themselves on the back and pretend all is “nice”.

You should know that one of the favorite PR gambits of the US refugee resettlement contractors is to get lovely “refugees-first-Thanksgiving” stories published at this time of year.  They are masters at planting warm and fuzzy propaganda, and that is one reason we write this! To balance and challenge the news!

If you search around today, you will see that stories were published in several cities about the generosity of the contractors (no doubt using your tax dollars!) in feeding a scrumptious dinner to newly arrived refugees (their “clients”).   But, that isn’t why I’m writing.  There were a few lines in the USA Today story that got my attention and I want to share them with you.

Remember that legitimate asylum seekers must be able to prove persecution (for religion, race, or political persuasion) when they get to the first SAFE COUNTRY after leaving their place of persecution.  They are to ask for asylum in that first safe country.   They aren’t supposed to be hopping around the world from safe country to safe country shopping for the best deal!

So why the hell are we taking black African “refugees” from the Rainbow Nation of South Africa which was supposedly built on the notion that no matter what color you were, you were in a country that WELCOMED everyone!

Mulungula “Nico” Mungela is the Congolese ‘star of the story’ (this must be J-school 101, put a sympathetic character in your opening paragraph!) at USA Today and in 2006 he left DR Congo and arrived in South Africa—the Rainbow Nation—a SAFE country.

Now does this sound like a “refugee?”  Within 3 years he had two new Master’s degrees, and a good college instructor job in the Rainbow Nation.   Are we to believe that all that equality talk from Nelson Mandela was a bunch of mumbo-jumbo? (It may be for South African whites, but Mungela was a black man in a country run by all black leaders!).

By the way, this isn’t to criticize Mr. Mungela who just took advantage of a good thing, it is to question UNHCR and US State Department policy that has become a  lawless free-for-all policy without any supervision by Congress where we are just slapping on that refugee label and bringing them in from anywhere!

From USA Today (emphasis is mine):

His journey took him south through Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique and finally into South Africa, by bus, boat, ship, and hitching rides. He was robbed once right in the middle of a road in Tanzania.

Through a Congo pastor who’d rescued him from the beach, he landed a job as a parking lot guard in Durban. Later, after he sent for his family, he secured a loan to return to college and earned two master’s degrees.

Although he and his wife could support their family — he through a college instructor’s job working with special-needs students and Dorcas by operating a home day care — the family still struggled to gain a foothold. The country is still rife with discrimination, Mungela said.

[What! The Rainbow Nation discriminates against blacks? Has anyone told Obama that the whole Mandela rainbow thing is a myth?]

In May 2009, the couple applied for refugee status and resettlement through the International Organization for Migration, which partners with the United Nations High Commission for Refugees. Their category covers survivors of violence.

So now he and his 8 kids largely live on your dime in Kentucky. Wouldn’t it have been of greater benefit to South Africa to leave a well-educated man there to help South Africa?

What are we thinking!  We resettled 322 UN designated “refugees” from South Africa in ONE month of FY2015 alone!  See here. It is almost certain NONE of them are white as the communist ANC government deliberately intervenes in all white asylum cases WORLDWIDE claiming that is an unfounded claim. Seems they do not do the same for black asylum seekers…



Here is the reason: GOVERNMENT MONEY:


About the photo and Kentucky Refugees Ministries.  In its most recent Form 990 KRM took in $4,703,422 from government contracts as part of a total revenue stream of $5,287,956 which means they are 89% funded by taxpayer dollars in a Wilson Fish state where the resettlement program is run by the federal government’s contractors (with no say by elected representatives of the state government of Kentucky).

When you visit that Form 990 be sure to check out the costs of running this ‘non-profit’ for salaries, office expenses, travel etc.


Enjoyed this post? Share it!