As Zuma and most blacks know, all you have to do is mention the word Apartheid and the left wing money powers start throwing money at you. It is the route for most black people into University today, grants (including residence and spending money, etc. etc.), based on the excessive use of the words victim and apartheid in application forms.
It certainly is the cheapest way to fund regime change and a country’s destruction, and sustain its enslavement and probably cheaper than war! For instance when the Clinton Institute throws money at black supremacist movements for their legal aid and costs, it is the Elitist lawyers that get the money and the system is severely disrupted and skewed. A win-win for the global Financial Elite and one which keeps on giving a return on the investment in mandela and SACP/ANC. A recipe they repeated thoughout the entire sub-Saharan Africa, in fact it eventually became known as “One Man, One Vote, ONE TIME”! Meaning they only needed one election to get their man in, and from there on they had total control of the country… and eventually Africa.
The bottom line is that no African country will be allowed to be successful, ever, no way, no how! Not until all Africa is one country anyway.
Almost everything you have heard or read in the Elite owned mass media about Apartheid and the creation of the mandela saint (New World Order Poster Boy) has been twisted towards this aim of victimology…
Julius Malema, leader of the EFF party, third largest in Parliament, said it was better under Apartheid!
…and NONE of it has anything to do with WHITE people or Apartheid… but I guess if you repeat the lie often enough you actually start believing the drivel coming from your mouth, Mr. Uneducated Zuma!
So, here is the challenge: Victimhood or Nationhood? Given that 10 black South African nations were excluded by the British from voting on inclusion in the Union of South Africa in 1910 (nor for that matter were the Khoi, the San Bushman, the two Boer Republics or even the Cape Colony – strangely only Natal Colony was given a vote, no doubt so that the globalist power could pretend a referendum was indeed held and so doing force and trick 12 nations into a Union without explicit permission), maybe we should give the 10 black nations trapped inside South Africa that opportunity? Time for a referendum for the black nations in Southern Africa?
It is also a well known British globalist tactic to draw arbitrary borders in deliberate disregard to traditional existing ones or local tribes and languages, and in so doing invoke ongoing battles and strife in the region, preventing any progress or regional power emerging. This tactic has been employed by the Globalist Power (British at that time) in India / Pakistan, the Middle East, Iraq, throughout Africa and most colonies. Apartheid had therefore been in direct opposition to this policy of deliberate strife with its policy of separate development and independence (4 had already achieved full independence) for each of the traditional historic nations in their own homelands where they had been living since the inception of their tribes in previous centuries. Apartheid had thus become a regional power which was the very thing the policy of deliberate strife was intended to prevent. Apartheid had become a regional power with the potential of superseding the globalist power in the region, so it had to go… … and the Globalist Power gets what it wants, no matter the cost in lives…
According to the World Bank Atlas of 1985, the Black Infant Mortality rate in South Africa was 32% lower than the figure for rest of Africa. The urban black IMR was only 32/1000 by 1985, compared to the South African average of 55.
The life expectancy of whites in South Africa was 68 years by 1991. The black life expectancy raised from 34 years in 1960 to level Europe’s in 1991 (65).
In 1965 the economic growth of South Africa was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was a mere 2% per annum and the prime interest rate only 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.
A few months before Dr. Verwoerd was assassinated (for similar reason to JFK no doubt), the editor of the British periodical, “Statist”, Paul Bareau, wrote…
“At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term „miracle” is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”.
“Time magazine”, eleven days before Dr. Verwoerd’s assassination, wrote,
“South Africa is in the midst of a massive boom. Attracted by cheap labour, a gold backed currency and high profits, investors from all over the world have ploughed money into the country, and the new industries that they have started have sent production, consumption – and the demand for labour – soaring. Such are the proportions of prosperity…”
Even Lord Deedes admitted, “White South Africa grew to become the economic giant of the continent, the other members of the Commonwealth virtually sank into poverty.”
Quotes like these are numerous and a testimony to the success of Dr. Verwoerd’s policy of “Separate development”. These quotes come from sources that were normally extremely hostile to Dr. Verwoerd and South Africa.
What was happening at the time was that Dr. Verwoerd was winning the Cold War all by himself. He was showing the world how successful Nationalism is and he was showing up the failure that Socialism/Communism is,which is what the Globalist Money Power were secretly implementing over a century long programme called “Incrementalism” via the Council of foreign Relations and the Fabian Society amongst many other facades…
The leaders are handpicked and the citizens have been brainwashed and are completely on song, totally unaware whilst being fed their daily dose of mass media propaganda being kept distracted with Football, X-factor and Idols.