Challenge to SA Blacks: Victimhood or Nationhood. Stop Cashing in on Apartheid Victimhood, and Hold a Referendum on Nationhood

I will lay out the challenge at the end, but first, let’s set the record straight as regards cashing in on Apartheid Victimhood despite it being less murderous than black on black, communist and even Asian violence!

As Zuma and most blacks know, all you have to do is mention the word Apartheid and the left wing money powers start throwing money at you. It is the route for most black people into University today, grants (including residence and spending money, etc. etc.), based on the excessive use of the words victim and apartheid in application forms.


This is however no accident, as the people who engineered, setup and funded the Anti Apartheid movement certainly did not have high morals or “equality” in mind when they decided Apartheid South Africa was no longer useful to their globalist ambitions. Sure, the shortcut to the moral high ground offered to liberals who would support and promote the cause was the intended driver of the attack.

It certainly is the cheapest way to fund regime change and a country’s destruction, and sustain its enslavement and probably cheaper than war! For instance when the Clinton Institute throws money at black supremacist movements for their legal aid and costs, it is the Elitist lawyers that get the money and the system is severely disrupted and skewed. A win-win for the global Financial Elite and one which keeps on giving a return on the investment in mandela and SACP/ANC. A recipe they repeated thoughout the entire sub-Saharan Africa, in fact it eventually became known as “One Man, One Vote, ONE TIME”! Meaning they only needed one election to get their man in, and from there on they had total control of the country… and eventually Africa.


The bottom line is that no African country will be allowed to be successful, ever, no way, no how! Not until all Africa is one country anyway.
The Anti Apartheid Sanctions bill in United States was not about the segregation, it was not about the victims, although they were the excuse, it was not about the sharing of power, it was about the transfer of power to a small minority Elite, namely the Communist Party of South Africa under the cloak of the ANC.
The Anti-Apartheid movement was a One World Order tool sponsored by the biggest Marxist Trojan Horse: United States of America Government as controlled by this Elite who had chosen / appointed Reagan as their candidate.
Apartheid South Africa’s alleged Denial of Human Rights, was far less reprehensible than all communist nations, most nations in Asia and virtually all of the dictatorships in Africa! With much of South Africa’s proposed horrors being myths. If South Africa was so horrible, why did blacks continue to stream into SA, even risking their lives to do so?
In fact the Zulu Genocide which lasted only 10 years. murdered 100 times more people than the entire 40 years of Apartheid, and let’snot even look at the Xhosa Suicide / Genocide!
Yet still USA Gov. chose to fund terror in SA and destabilise the SA government on a politically correct cultural Marxist platform of “racism” and LGBT indulgence, activation, polarization and victimology greased along with oodles of dollars for anything from parade banners to legal fees. (The same cultural bombshell dropped on most Western christian nations). Having ownership or sway over the world’s media made it a slam dunk self fulfilling prophecy.
In truth their agenda was simply the destruction of nationhood. It has been their agenda worldwide for a century, to destroy all nations, languages and cultures and form a single one world government, which they, the small financial Elite rule. Tower of Babel v.2.0
The facts speak for themselves. Clearly Apartheid was nowhere near the level of the “holocaust”, yet daily one hears it being put on that level by “victims” and those wanting to cash in on it.
As many people as were murdered in the entire 40 years of Apartheid are now murdered EVERY YEAR in black South Africa, yes, most of them black – 49 people a day! Then we have the 26 successful suicides a day in SA and we won’t even look at deaths from hospital and police negligence and incompetency due to affirmative action placement and cadre deployment (appointing ANC voters instead of suitably qualified staff).

Almost everything you have heard or read in the Elite owned mass media about Apartheid and the creation of the mandela saint (New World Order Poster Boy) has been twisted towards this aim of victimology…

This chart should dispel any doubts you might have about the reach the globalist power has into your mind…

Julius Malema, leader of the EFF party, third largest in Parliament, said it was better under Apartheid!
Even a well known South African commentator, Juju Mkize compared the black on black to Apartheid violence recently:
<<< How the hell can we believe you Mr President >>>
“South Africans are psychologically sick as a result of the violence inflicted upon the majority of the country’s people during the apartheid era”, President Jacob Zuma said.
This is getting really old! The history of black South Africans has always been that of violence, death and destruction – NOT inflicted upon them by white people in this country.
Shaka Zulu, during his 10-year reign butchered more than 2 million black people in South Africa, not counting the deaths during mass tribal migrations to escape his armies. He had his warriors clubbed to death upon the merest sign of weakness. He neither took a legal wife nor fathered a son, for fear that his heir would plot against him, and had his concubines executed if he discovered they were pregnant. When his mother died, he massacred thousands of his subjects so their families would mourn along with him. Shaka retained his throne through the worst kind of sheer terror, vast mass executions, torture and mindless butchery.
His brother, Dingane, was no better. He took power after the assassination of Shaka and started his reign by butchering those loyal to Shaka.
THAT, amongst many other horror stories of black-on-black violence, is the history of Black South Africa.
During the Apartheid years it was not better. Factional fighting and tribal conflict was again the main cause of violence and death amongst black South Africans.
During the Apartheid era, from 1948 to 1994, the average life expectancy of black South Africans had risen to 64 years, on par with Europe’s average life expectancy. Infant death rates had by been reduced from 174 to 55 infant deaths per thousand, higher than Europe’s, but considerably lower than the rest of the African continent’s. The African population in South Africa increased by 50%.
Deaths due to political violence during apartheid:
21 000 people died in political violence in South Africa during apartheid of whom 14 000 died during the six-year transition process from 1990 to 1994.
This includes SA Defence Force actions, for instance the 600 deaths at Kassinga in Angola during the war in 1978.
Of those deaths, the vast majority, 92%, have been primarily due to Africans killing Africans, such as the inter-tribal battles for territory.
During the period June 1990 to July 1993 a total of 8580 (92%) of the 9 325 violent deaths during the period June 1990 to July 1993 were caused by Africans killing Africans, or as the news media often calls it, “Black on Black” violence – hostel killings, Inkatha Freedom Party versus ANC killings and taxi and turf war violence.
The security forces caused 518 deaths (5.6%) throughout this period.
During the transitional period, the primary causes of deaths were not security forces nor white right-wing violence against blacks, but mainly due to “black-on-black necklace murders”, tribal conflict between the ANC-IFP, bombs by the ANC and PAC’s military wings in shopping centers, landmines on farm roads, etc.
In this country TODAY as many as 18 000 people are murdered EVERY year. …and those are the official statistics. More than 400 000 people have been murdered in South Africa under ANC rule. The past 20 years have been the most violent in the history of this country since the death of Shaka Zulu.

…and NONE of it has anything to do with WHITE people or Apartheid… but I guess if you repeat the lie often enough you actually start believing the drivel coming from your mouth, Mr. Uneducated Zuma!



So, here is the challenge: Victimhood or Nationhood? Given that 10 black South African nations were excluded by the British from voting on inclusion in the Union of South Africa in 1910 (nor for that matter were the Khoi, the San Bushman, the two Boer Republics or even the Cape Colony – strangely only Natal Colony was given a vote, no doubt so that the globalist power could pretend a referendum was indeed held and so doing force and trick 12 nations into a Union without explicit permission), maybe we should give the 10 black nations trapped inside South Africa that opportunity? Time for a referendum for the black nations in Southern Africa?


It is also a well known British globalist tactic to draw arbitrary borders in deliberate disregard to traditional existing ones or local tribes and languages, and in so doing invoke ongoing battles and strife in the region, preventing any progress or regional power emerging. This tactic has been employed by the Globalist Power (British at that time) in India / Pakistan, the Middle East, Iraq, throughout Africa and most colonies. Apartheid had therefore been in direct opposition to this policy of deliberate strife with its policy of separate development and independence (4 had already achieved full independence) for each of the traditional historic nations in their own homelands where they had been living since the inception of their tribes in previous centuries. Apartheid had thus become a regional power which was the very thing the policy of deliberate strife was intended to prevent. Apartheid had become a regional power with the potential of superseding the globalist power in the region, so it had to go…  … and the Globalist Power gets what it wants, no matter the cost in lives…


Read the African experience of a former U.S. Army officer who has been elected to the San Diego City Council, state Assembly and state Senate. He also served as a municipal and superior court judge in San Diego,  here: 
As an indication of Apartheid success (as hard as it might be for you to read that phrase given your conditioning through mass media):
In 1966 unemployment under the black bantu nations of South Africa was only 5%! Today under a so called “just” system it is nearer to 40%. There is a deluge of statistics to prove the viability and success of the policy of good neighbourliness
The blacks in Southern Africa had a far higher standard of living than the rest of Africa and it was growing even faster than that of whites. The policy of “Separate development (“Apartheid”), meant the living standards of Blacks was rising at 5,4% per year against that of the whites at 3,9% per year.

According to the World Bank Atlas of 1985, the Black Infant Mortality rate in South Africa was 32% lower than the figure for rest of Africa. The urban black IMR was only 32/1000 by 1985, compared to the South African average of 55.

The life expectancy of whites in South Africa was 68 years by 1991. The black life expectancy raised from 34 years in 1960 to level Europe’s in 1991 (65).

In 1965 the economic growth of South Africa was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was a mere 2% per annum and the prime interest rate only 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.

A few months before Dr. Verwoerd was assassinated (for similar reason to JFK no doubt), the editor of the British periodical, “Statist”, Paul Bareau, wrote…

“At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term „miracle” is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”.

“Time magazine”, eleven days before Dr. Verwoerd’s assassination, wrote,

“South Africa is in the midst of a massive boom. Attracted by cheap labour, a gold backed currency and high profits, investors from all over the world have ploughed money into the country, and the new industries that they have started have sent production, consumption – and the demand for labour – soaring. Such are the proportions of prosperity…”

Even Lord Deedes admitted, “White South Africa grew to become the economic giant of the continent, the other members of the Commonwealth virtually sank into poverty.”

Quotes like these are numerous and a testimony to the success of Dr. Verwoerd’s policy of “Separate development”. These quotes come from sources that were normally extremely hostile to Dr. Verwoerd and South Africa.

What was happening at the time was that Dr. Verwoerd was winning the Cold War all by himself. He was showing the world how successful Nationalism is and he was showing up the failure that Socialism/Communism is,which is what the Globalist Money Power were secretly implementing over a century long programme called “Incrementalism” via the Council of foreign Relations and the Fabian Society amongst many other facades…

 For more real facts about Apartheid’s ACHIEVEMENTS, (hidden by the mass media), read here: 
The ANC and its silent passenger, the South African Communist Party, with all the Billions the Globalist Money Power has thrown at them, has done everything possible to vilify and destroy and stamp out and even make illegal any talk of nationhood or independence or even self determination. Even words like tribe and self determination have now been demonised and classed as xenophobic by the politically correct “thought police” and their media lackeys. Talk of secession or independence will get you thrown in jail, some of our people have already been visited by secret services for this very reason!
Despite that, here is a map created recently by blacks themselves (there was NO white input or influence), of how they see a possible future…
If you still have any doubts about the systematic, deliberate destruction of Africa and South Africa, invest half an hour (sacrifice a mass media brainwashing episode of X-factor, Idols or soccer) and watch this video made way back in 1988 already!

The use of “terror” attacks to facilitate regime change seems to have become a recognisable pattern in the wars the US chooses to get involved in. Indications are that the US, UK and EU (The Allies) Governments have been hijacked and turned into a Marxist One World Order Trojan Horse.
The leaders are handpicked and the citizens have been brainwashed and are completely on song, totally unaware whilst being fed their daily dose of mass media propaganda being kept distracted with Football, X-factor and Idols.
Would there have been a Paris Massacre had Russia not stepped on US Gov’s toes in their endeavors to effect regime change in Syria?

Enjoyed this post? Share it!